HEC PRESS Publisher of the
Healthy Eating Club website &
A
sia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition

 


Volume 16 (2007)
1 Issue 1
1 Issue 2
1 Issue 3
1 Issue 4
1 Supplement 1
1 Supplement 2
Volume 15 (2006)
Issue 1
Issue 2
Issue 3
Issue 4
Supplement
Nutrition Society of Australia
Volume 14 (2005)
Issue 1
Supplement on CD
IUNS/APCNS proceedings
Issue 2
Issue 3
Issue 4
Supplement
Nutrition Society of Australia
CURRENT YEAR ISSUES
LOGIN to FULL PAPERS
subscribers only
PAST ISSUES
View full papers (free)
CD-Rom AU$190 vol1-13
NUTRITION SOCIETY OF AUSTRALIA 1976-
View Abstracts
Search our site
 
1000 Asia Pacific J Clin Nutr (1997) 6(4): 296-311

Asia Pacific J Clin Nutr (1997) 6(4): 296-311

Free radical and antioxidant status in urban and rural Tirupati men: interaction with nutrient intake, substance abuse, obesity and body fat distribution

KK Reddy1, R Ramamurthy2, BV Somasekaraiah3, TP Kumara Reddy1, Papa Rao1

1 Department of Anthropology, 2 Department of Zoology, School of Biological & Earth Sciences, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, India
3 Department of Chemistry, St. Joseph’s College, Bangalore, India


Rapid growth in urbanisation and industrialisation causes exposure to toxicant pollution which may contribute to increased incidences of non-communicable diseases. The present study reports on plasma lipid peroxides (LPO), lymphocyte free radicals, antioxidants and DNA damage in relation to life-style, obesity and body fat distribution measures among 56 urban men and 45 age matched rural men. Significant increases in plasma LPO, free radical generation (superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide), and DNA damage indicated by malondialdehyde (MDA) levels were observed in urban compared to rural men. In vitro assay of DNA damage showed a higher level of MDA in samples of urban men than those of rural men. There were no significant differences in antioxidant enzymes between urban and rural men. Neither body mass index nor fat distribution had a significant influence on free radical generation, while the habits of smoking and alcohol consumption were associated with increased levels of free radicals, plasma LPO and DNA damage and reduced levels of antioxidant enzymes such as glutathione-S-transferase (GST), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase in urban men. Dietary energy and fat intakes were positively correlated with free radical generation. Both superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide were positively correlated with LPO and DNA damage, and negatively correlated with antioxidant enzymes in urban men. The marked elevation of free radical generation, LPO, DNA damage and depletion in antioxidant levels in urban men may suggest that exposure to environmental toxicant pollution is a risk factor for oxidative damage. It was of interest in this study that, whilst BMI was not greater in urban than rural men, abdominal fatness was. Hypothetically, fat distribution could be altered by the process of oxidative damage if it altered regulation of metabolically active omental fat.

Key words: free radicals, antioxidants, Tirupati, India, rural, urban, nutrient intake, alcohol, cigarette smoking, obesity, body fat distribution


Introduction

Populations exposed to toxicants from industrialisation and urbanisation reveal increased risk of heart disease, cancers, age associated degenerative diseases and genetic damage1-5. Free radicals are capable of inducing 1000 DNA damage and mutagenesis6. Mutagens may be either free radicals directly involved in reactions or generate free radical intermediates7. Human tissue free radical concentrations in industrial environments are much higher than those who live and work in rural environments3. Free radical reactions and lipid peroxidation products may play a significant role in physio-logical impairment and in various pathological conditions8. The intracellular concentration of both free radicals and non-radical lipid peroxidation products are physiologically controlled by scavenger molecules and protective enzymatic mechanisms. Inadequate physiological antioxidant defence systems may thus lead to oxidative damage9.

Differences in geographical location, inadequate attention to confounding factors such as age, sex and life style factors, and disease all contribute to oxidative stress10. Oxidative damage correlates with smoking habits11. Frei et al12 have shown that tobacco smoking induces lipid peroxidation and lipoprotein oxidation by diminishing antioxidant concentration. A higher metabolic rate among lean persons may promote an increase in oxidative damage13,14, unless matched by increased antioxidant capacity. Depletion of total antioxidants among the obese may also elevate levels of lipid peroxides15.

Although studies have been conducted in different animal and human populations to show effects of free radical mediated oxidative stress, human populations in developing countries, such as India, have not been studied in relation to modernisation of life style and industrialisation, which are occurring rapidly. Therefore, the present study has been undertaken to assess the levels of lymphocyte free radicals and antioxidants in relation to life style, obesity and body fat distribution in an urban and rural community.

Materials and methods

56 healthy male urban subjects were selected by a purposive sampling technique. All urban subjects lived in densely populated market and business centres of Tirupati. 32 worked in the sugar industry, 19 with dry cell batteries and the remaining 5 worked as metal welders, in the industrial zone of Tirupati. For controls, 45 age matched healthy male agricultural farm workers, 40km away from the Tirupati industrial zone were selected. Subjects were asked, but not compelled to participate or subjected to any risk, other than that usually entailed in their occupation. Informed consent was given. Age ranged from 25 to 48 years.

The participants were interviewed about smoking habits, alcohol usage and dietary intake. All subjects were involved in heavy manual labour. Dietary information was collected, using a 7-d prospective survey. After examination, each person received a 7-d dairy to record his daily food intake and its quality, quantity, origin and method of preparation. In the morning of eight day, a dietitian interviewed each subject for details and evaluated the quantity of food ingested per day. From this 7-d collection of information, daily intake of energy and other nutrients were calculated from the food composition tables, based on Gopalan et al16.

The physical assessment included height, weight, circumferences of the waist and hip according to the method specified by Shimokata et al17. The body mass index (BMI) was calculated as BMI = weight in kg/height in metres2 (kg/m2). Obesity was defined as BMI > 25. Waist hip ratio (WHR) was calculated from the circumferences of waist and hip.

Venous blood (10 ml) was collected in the morning from all subjects into disposable vials containing 1000 EDTA. Plasma was separated from the whole blood on centrifugation at 3000 rpm. Lymphocytes were separated from the whole blood by dextran sedimentation technique18.

Plasma lipid peroxidation products: Thiobarbituric acid was added to plasma sample under acidic condition, and the absorption of colour that developed after heating was estimated spectrophotometrically at 535nm19. 1,1,3,3-tetra-ethoxy propane (TEP) was used as internal standard. Super-oxide anion: Superoxide anion can reduce nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) to the insoluble formazan20. Hydrogen Peroxide: Hydrogen peroxide released by lymphocytes was estimated by the horse-radish peroxidase method21. 1 x 106 lymphocyte cells/assay were taken for both Superoxide anion and H2O2 assay.

Lymphocyte Antioxidants: Glutathione-S-transferase: GST activity was measured by following the increase in absorbance at 340 nm using 1-chloro-2,4 clinitrobenzene (CDNB) as a substrate as described by Habig et al22. Superoxide dismutase: SOD activity was assayed according to the method of Misra and Fridovich23. Catalase: Catalase assay was carried out by the method of Beer and Sizer24. The decomposition of H2O2 was followed directly by measuring the decrease in absorbance at 240 nm.

DNA damage: DNA was extracted from lymphocytes by the procedure of Hoar et al25. The study also carried out a simple analysis for DNA damage, and in vitro DNA damage with the addition of TEP, an analogue for MDA, in samples from both urban and rural communities.

TBA assay for DNA damage: The principle of the assay is that sugar fragments consists of compounds that carry one or several carbonyl functions26. Mix one aliquot of the DNA solution with one aliquot of 0.6% 2-thiobarbituric acid. The contents were heated at 90°C for 20 min and the developed red colour was measured at 537 nm. The values were expressed as nmol MDA equivalents/mg DNA.

In vitro DNA Damage: Aliquots of DNA solution prepared in tris buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4) in the absence and presence of MDA were analysed to evaluate in vitro DNA damage27. MDA was obtained from acid hydrolysis of tetraethoxypropane (Reaction mixture containing 50 m l TEP and 100 m l HCl (0.1 N) in 100 ml doubly distilled water was incubated at 50°C for 1 hr. The hydrolysed product MDA was characterised by its wave length maxima at 245 nm and Î value of 1.3 x 104 M-1 Cm-1). The UV absorption of native DNA solution was first recorded. Next the DNA solution was incubated with MDA (50 nmol) for ½ hr in a water jacketed incubator maintained at 37°C and UV absorption recorded. D OD was calculated for each sample as an increase after MDA treatment. The concentration of DNA extracted from each individual was 25 m g.

Statistical analysis included multiple regression analysis and partial correlations. P<0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results

Body mass index, weight and height were not significantly different between urban and rural men, whereas, WHR or central (trunk) fat distribution was higher in urban men than rural men. Urban men consumed more total energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate and ascorbic acid than did rural men (Table 1). Levels of both LPO and lymphocyte free radical 1000 s (superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide) were significant-ly higher in urban men than rural men (Table 2). The level of DNA damage was 4.51 nmol MDA equi/mg DNA in urban compared to 1.98 nmol MDA equi/ mg DNA in rural men (Table 2). Lymphocyte antioxidant levels were not significantly different between urban and rural men.

Table 1. Mean values for anthropometry and dietary variables amongst urban and rural males.

 

Urban n = 56

Rural n = 45

 
Variable

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

t value

Height (cm)

164.5 ± 5.9

165.3 ± 6.1

0.67

Weight (kg)

58.5 ± 7.3

57.1 ± 7.6

0.89

BMI (kg/m2)

21.7 ± 2.6

20.9 ± 2.4

1.55

Waist circum (cm)

76.9 ± 5.6

74.7 ± 4.7

2.14*

Hip circum (cm)

89.8 ± 3.9

88.0 ± 3.2

2.59*

WHR

0.86 ± 0.04

0.85 ± 0.03

2.01*

Total energy (K cal)

2445 ± 283

2037 ± 336

6.5*

Protein (g)

62.4 ± 7.9

52.7 ± 9.7

5.44*

Fat (g)

24.1 ± 7.1

15.0 ± 5.9

7.11*

Fibre (g)

2.7 ± 0.5

2.8 ± 0.6

1.06

Carbohydrate (g)

529.3 ± 73.0

453.1 ± 81.8

4.88*

Ascorbic Acid (mg)

8.3 ± 2.1

5.3 ± 1.9

7.62*

* Difference between populations significant at p < 0.05

When urban men were divided into 3 groups based on body mass index (< 20, 20-24.9, 25-29.9 considering >25 as obese), body fat distribution, plasma LPO, free radical generation and DNA damage were not different within the BMI groups (Table 3). But, WHR and LPO were significantly higher in obese subjects than those from other group. A significant increase in the activities of GST and Catalase were observed from the group of <20 to 24.9 units of BMI, and a decreased activity of GST alone was significant among obese individuals.

Based on habits, urban men were divided into smokers and non-smokers and alcohol users and non-users and the results are presented in Table 3. There was a significant increase in plasma LPO, lymphocyte free radicals and DNA damage, while a decrease in lymphocyte antioxidant levels in smokers and alcoholics compared to non-smokers and non-alcoholics respectively.

Table 2. Mean values for plasma lipid peroxidation, lymphocyte free radicals and enzymatic antioxidant concentrations and lymphocyte DNA damage among urban an 1000 d rural men.

 

Urban n = 56

Rural n = 45

 
Variable

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

t value

Lipid peroxides nmol/ml plasma

3.31 ± 1.29

2.61 ± 1.29

2.71*

Superoxide anion

µ moles/1 x 106 cells

4.00 ± 2.13

2.14 ± 1.18

5.56*

Hydrogen peroxide

µ moles/1 x 106 cells

2.76 ± 1.7

1.23 ± 0.87

5.84*

DNA damage nmol MDA equiv/mg DNA

4.51 ± 3.12

1.98 ± 1.6

5.27*

Glutathione - S transferase µ moles/mg protein

100.01 ± 27.62

92.20 ± 25.9

1.46

Superoxide dismutase U /mg protein

66.55 ± 25.75

64.4 ± 22.99

0.44

Catalase U 1000 / mg protein

48.32 ± 22.80

45.93 ± 19.25

0.57

*Difference between populations significant at p < 0.05

Table 3. Plasma lipid peroxidation (LPO), lymphocyte free radicals and enzymatic antioxidant concentrations and lymphocyte DNA damage in urban men with different BMI, smoking habits and alcoholism.

1000
 

WHR

LPO

Superoxide anion

Hydrogen peroxide

DNA damage

GST

SOD

Catalase

BMI < 20 (n=17)

0.84±0.04

2.86±1.17

3.49±1.80

2.32±1.16

4.24±2.86

91.47±20.14

61.76±20.03

41.29±19.34

BMI 20-24.9 (n=31)

0.85±0.04

3.27±1.21

4.06±2.13

2.75±1.73

4.12±3.01

108.52*±28.51

72.25±26.18

54.61*±22.73

BMI 25-29.9 1000 (n=8)

0.88*±0.04

4.42*±1.38

4.90±2.66

3.74±2.25

6.58±3.63

85.63*±29.12

54.63±31.48

38.88±24.84

Smokers (n=20)

0.86±0.05

4.40±0.93

5.81±1.81

4.19±1.42

7.33±2.20

74.70±15.84

41.80±19.90

25.15±14.37

Non-Smokers (n=36)

0.85±0.04

2.71*±1.06

3.01*±1.55

1.97*±1.27

2.94*±2.36

114.17*±22.14

80.31*±16.78

61.19*±15.08

Alcoholics (n=10)

0.85±0.04

4.17±0.94

5.22±2.21

3.80±1.46

6.75±2.87

80.90±16.28

49.00±21.88

29.00±17.52

Non- alcoholics (n=46)

0.85±0.04

3.13*±1.29

3.74*±2.03

2.53*±1.67

4.01*±2.98

104.20*±27.92

70.37*±25.12

52.52*±21.75

* Significant difference within the groups at p < 0.05

Partial correlation coefficients for free radical generation ie, superoxide anion and H2O2 to plasma LPO, DNA damage, lymphocyte antioxidants, BMI, WHR and dietary intake were calculated (Table 4). Both superoxide anion and H2O2 were positively associated with plasma LPO and DNA damage, and negatively related with the antioxidant enzymes GST, SOD and catalase. Free radical concentrations were not correlated with BMI or WHR. Among dietary variables energy and fat intake alone positively correlated with lymphocyte free radical concentrations.

Regression equations for free radical generation in urban men may be used to predict either superoxide anion or H2O2 taking into account age, smoking habits, alcohol use, BMI, fat distribution, plasma LPO, DNA damage and antioxidant enzymes (Table 5). 83% of the variance in free radical generation was explained by independent variables. Anti-oxidant enzymes (GSTs, SOD and catalase), plasma LPO and DNA damage account for a high percentage of the variance in either superoxide anion or H2O2 generation indicating that increase in plasma LPO or decrease in antioxidant enzymes may elevate the free radical generation. Age contributed significant variance while smoking was a significant source of positive variance for free radical generation. For dietary composition, fat alone provided significant positive prediction of free radical concentration. Both body mass index and body fat contributed negatively but not significantly to free radical concentration.

Table 4. Partial correlation coefficients for free radical generation with serum LPO, DNA damage, GST, SOD, Catalase, BMI, body fat and dietary intake for urban males controlled for age.

Variable

Superoxide anion

Hydrogen peroxide

LPO

0.8188*

0.8479*

DNA damage

0.8293*

0.8111*

GST

-0.4406*

-0.4991*

SOD

-0.5501*

-0.5533*

Catalase

-0.4873*

-0.4831*

BMI

0.0882

-0.1408

WHR

-0.0004

-0.0460

Energy

0.1906*

0.1981*

Protein

-0.0648

-0.1237

Fat

0.1823

0.1988*

Fibre

-0.1532

-0.1250

Carbohydrate

-0.0850

-0.0813

Ascorbic acid

-0.0212

0.0427

* Significant at p < 0.05

Table 5. Prediction of free radical generation in m 1000 ultiple regression analysis for urban males.

Dependant

Superoxide anion

Hydrogen peroxide

variable

Coefficient

t value

Coefficient

t value

Age

-0.0142

-0.38

-0.0367

-1.30

Smoking

0.5742

1.98*

0.4986

1.03

Alcohol

0.0132

0.03

-0.1822

-0.55

Energy

0.0004

0.41

0.0003

0.43

Protein

0.0227

0.66

-0.0064

-0.25

Fat

0.0766

2.02*

-0.0528

-1.87

Fibre

0.0704

0.21

0.0784

0.31

Carbohydrate

-0.0005

-0.18

-0.0001

-0.03

Ascorbic acid

0.0609

0.69

0.0634

0.98

BMI

-0.0116

-0.18

-0.0133

-0.27

WHR

-0.5064

-0.10

2.4921

0.65

GST

0.0228

1.70

-0.0005

-0.05

SOD

-0.0590

-2.19*

-0.0339

-2.10*

Catalase

0.0283

1.32

0.0350

2.21*

LPO

1.2243

6.08*

0.9891

6.61*

Intercept

0.9327

0.22

0.1231

0.04

Multiple r2

0.8330

0.8547

* Significant at p < 0.05

Mean D optical density values presented in Tables 6 & 7 show the difference in OD values of native DNA before incubation and after incubation with 50 nmol of TEP at 37°C for 20 min. Significant differences were observed between rural and urban men. In urban men, smokers and alcoholic users possess significant higher OD values.

Table 6. D UV absorption spectra of urban and rural males

 

Urban (n=56)

Rural (n=45)

 
 

D OD values

D OD values

t value

 

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

 
Total Sample

0.052 ± 0.024

0.031 ± 0.021

4.74*

D OD values = DNA in presence of MDA (50 nmol) - native DNA ; * Significant at p < 0.05

Table 7. D UV absorption spectra of urban men by BMI, smoking and alcoholism

Variable

n

D OD values
Mean ± SD

BMI    
1. < 20

17

0.052 ± 0.027

2. 20-24.9

31

0.047 ± 0.02

3. 25 >

8

0.057 ± 0.032

Smokers

20

0.069 ± 0.031

Non-smokers

36

0.04 ± 0.01*

Alcoholics

10

0.061 ± 0.032

Non-alcoholics

46

0.047 ± 0.03*

D OD values = DNA in presence of MDA (50 nmol) - native DNA ; n = sample size; * Significant at p < 0.05

Discussion

Industrialisation and urbanisation cause exposure to environmental pollution, which contains reactive com-pounds of smog induces free radicals causing lipid peroxidation and DNA damage5. Significantly higher levels of LPO and lymphocyte free radicals in urban men probably indicate that urban men in Tirupati, India are exposed to a higher pollutive environment and less antioxidant capacity than rural men. We have previously observed increased concentrations of plasma lipid peroxides among a population exposed to toxicants5. Other studies demonstrate an increased generation of superoxide anion and H2O2, with elevated oxidative damage products such as protein carbonyls, lipofuscin and n–pentane28. Disease states and chemotherapy also increase free radical generation and lipid peroxidation29. Our results extend these findings to urbanisation.

Populations exposed to various industrial toxicants exhibit higher levels of hydroxyl radicals, DNA damage and sister chromatid exchange30-31. The results of the present study reveal an increased DNA damage measured as nmol of MDA equivalents per mg DNA in urban men, suggesting that free radicals and lipid peroxidation products induce DNA damage. The in vitro study demonstrated that DNA damage was more pronounced in the presence of MDA in samples from urban men than in those from rural men. Rongliang et al3 and Popp et al32 suggested that free radicals and sister chromatid exchange induce DNA protein cross links in metal exposed populations. However, Brambilla et al8 observed no relationship between MDA production and DNA radioactivity either in controls or with prooxidant stimulation. They suggested that interaction of lipid peroxidation products with DNA is limited.

Depletion of antioxidant enzymes in urban men and a negative correlation between free radical generation and antioxidants may allow DNA damage. Epidemiological and experimental studies show that antioxidants may protect against free radical-mediated damage33. Antioxidants reduce neutrophil free radical production and serum lipid peroxides in myocardial infarction34.

There was no correlation between BMI or body fat distribution with free radical concentration but antioxidant status in obese individuals was decreased with elevated levels of lipid peroxidation products. The data suggest that free radical concentration and DNA damage should take into account BMI in comparison of individuals along with other factors such as smoking and alcoholism.

Smoking influences more the levels of free radicals and DNA damage35. In vitro study has demonstrated that tobacco smoke and several of its constituents, such as hydroquinone and cathecol generate free radicals and induce oxidative DNA damage30. Mazette et al36 found higher lipid peroxide levels and lower antioxidant capacity among smokers compared to non-smokers. Higher concentration of free radicals, LPO and DNA damage, and lower antioxidant status in urban men who smoke and/or drink alcohol in the present study indicates that usage of cigarette and alcohol augments free radical generation. The apparent effect of tobacco smoking on free radical generation and DNA damage may also increase basic metabolic rate37, since the majority of non-obese individuals in the present study were smokers whose energy intake was higher.

Dietary composition was not found to have an effect on free radical generation or DNA damage, except for dietary fat which was positively related to free radical generation.

The positive relations between free radicals and LPO and the negative relations between free radicals and anti-oxidants provide evidence of oxidative stress with urbanisation or industrialisation. Tobacco smoke and alcohol may magnify the oxidative stress of industrialisation. Hence, occupational oxidative stress may be reduced through healthy life style. A large-scale intervention study in Tirupati with oxidative status as an end-point would be worthwhile.

Editor’s Note: It was of interest in this study that, whilst BMI was not greater in urban than rural men, abdominal fatness was. Hypothetically, fat distribution could be altered by the process of oxidative damage if it altered regulation of metabolically active omental fat.

Acknowledgments: This research was supported by Young Scientist Grant from the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India to Dr KK Reddy (SR/OY/MO3/1993). We would like to thank Dr Ramana Reddy, Director, SVU Computer Centre, Tirupati for permitting us to carry out the analysis, and the assistance of Dr Murali Krishna is appreciated.

References:

  1. Mandal PK. Cytogenetic damage in workers exposed to fertilisers. J Ecotoxicol Environ Monit 1991; 4: 317-320.
  2. Reddy KK, Bulliyya G, Ramachandraiah T, Kumari KS, Reddanna P, Thyagaraju K. Serum lipids and lipid peroxidation pattern in industrial and rural workers in India. Age 1991; 14: 33-38.
  3. Rongliang Z, Xiaoxuan W, Huping H, Zhanru F, Yuzhan Z. Sister chromatid exchange and DNA damage in human lymphocytes induced by air-dust in Lanzhou city: involvement in free radicals. J Environ Scineces 1991; 3: 69-74.
  4. Perara FP, Hemminkt K, Gryzbowska E, Motyklewicz G et al.,. Molecular and genetic damage in humans from environmental pollution in Poland. Nature 1992; 360: 256-258.
  5. Reddy KK, Ramachandraiah T, Reddanna P, Thyagaraju K. Serum lipid peroxides and lipids in urban and rural Indian men. Arch Environ Health 1994; 49: 123-27.
  6. Devasagayam TPA, Steenken S, Obendorf MSW, Schulz WA, Sies H. Formation of 8-hydroxy (deoxy) guanosine and generation of strand breaks at guanine residues in DNA by singlet oxygen. Biochemistry 1991; 30: 6283-89.
  7. Zheng R, Lesco SA, Trpis L, Ts'o OP. The verification for free radical mechanism of benzo (a) pyrene carcinogenesis. Acta Biochemica et Biophysica 1987;19:317-21.
  8. Brambilla G, Martelli A, Mancini UM. Is lipid peroxidation associated with DNA damage? Mutation Res 1989; 214: 123-27.
  9. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine. Oxford, Claredon Press 1989, 1-543.
  10. Bunker VW. Free radicals, antioxidants and ageing. Med Lab Sci 1992; 49: 299-312.
  11. Loft S, Fischer-Nelsen A, Jeding JB, Vistesen K, Poulsen HE. 8-hydroxyquanosine as a urinary biomarker of oxidative DNA damage. J Toxicol Environ Health 1993; 40: 391-404.
  12. Frei B, Forte JM, Ames BN, Cross CE. Ga