HEC PRESS Publisher of the
Healthy Eating Club website &
A
sia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition

 


Volume 16 (2007)
1 Issue 1
1 Issue 2
1 Issue 3
1 Issue 4
1 Supplement 1
1 Supplement 2
Volume 15 (2006)
Issue 1
Issue 2
Issue 3
Issue 4
Supplement
Nutrition Society of Australia
Volume 14 (2005)
Issue 1
Supplement on CD
IUNS/APCNS proceedings
Issue 2
Issue 3
Issue 4
Supplement
Nutrition Society of Australia
CURRENT YEAR ISSUES
LOGIN to FULL PAPERS
subscribers only
PAST ISSUES
View full papers (free)
CD-Rom AU$190 vol1-13
NUTRITION SOCIETY OF AUSTRALIA 1976-
View Abstracts
Search our site
 
1000 Asia Pacific J Clin Nutr (1995) 4: 125-128

Asia Pacific J Clin Nutr (1995) 4: 125-128

Body composition studies in intensive care patients: comparison of methods of measuring total body water

L.D. Plank, D.N. Monk, R. Gupta, G. Franch-Arcas, J. Pang and G.L. Hill

University Department of Surgery, Auckland Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

Changes in total body water (TBW) were monitored in 12 critically-ill intensive care patients using four independent methods. Over the 10-day study period TBW measured by tritium dilution changed from 51.3 ± 2.5 (SEM) kg to 43.6 ± 2.3 kg, an average loss of 7.7 ± 0.8 kg. A six-compartment model of the body incorporating measurements of protein by in vivo neutron activation analysis and fat and bone mineral by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to determine TBW by difference from body weight. The 10-day change in TBW measured by this approach was 8.4 ± 0.9 kg which correlated well with the tritium dilution changes (r=0.84, P<0.01, SEE=1.83 kg). The changes measured by single frequency and multi-frequency bio- electrical impedance analysis were not significantly different from the tritium results (9.7 ± 1.3 and 8.2 ± 0.8 kg. respectively) although the prediction errors were high for both methods (SEE=3.29 and 2.72 kg, respectively) with correlations that were statistically significant for the single frequency approach but not for the multi-frequency approach (r=0.71, P<0.01 and r=0.45, ns, respectively). The high prediction errors render these impedance techniques inappropriate, at the present time, for monitoring total water changes in individual intensive care patients.

Introduction

Critical illness is characterized by dramatic changes in body composition which include marked losses of body protein and expansion of body water. If these changes are large and prolonged they are associated with immunosuppression, compromised wound healing, loss of muscle function and finally, multiple-organ dysfunction or failure and in some cases, death. Reliable monitoring of the body composition of these patients offers a tool for testing the efficacy of new therapies designed to modify the metabolic disturbances suffered by these patients and thence to enhance their recovery. New developments in body composition technology have expanded the range of measurements that can be applied to such patients. For example, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) allows both total and regional fat, lean tissue and bone mineral assessment1 and estimation of total appendicular muscle mass< 1000 sup>2. Multiple frequency bioimpedance analysis (MFBIA) is under development to measure the total water compartment and its distribution across the intra- and extracellular spaces3. Both MFBIA and single frequency bioimpedance analysis (SFBIA) have yielded encouraging results when applied to healthy individuals3-5. In this report we have examined four independent methods of measuring total body water (TBW) in critically ill patients who have suffered either major trauma or serious sepsis. Our approach was to compare an established isotope dilution procedure for total water measurement with results given by SFBIA, MFBIA, and the combination of DEXA and in vivo neutron activation analysis (IVNAA).

Methods

Subjects

The study group comprised 12 patients (median age 25 years, range 16 to 53 years, 11 men, 1 woman) admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine, Auckland Hospital, suffering from major trauma (injury severity score > 16) or septic shock. Table 1 shows relevant clinical data. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Auckland Hospital, and informed consent was obtained from the patients' next of kin.

Table 1. Clinical data for 12 intensive care patients.

Patient Sex Age (yrs) Diagnosis
CT M 17 Head injury. Right extradural haematoma requiring surgical drainage.
SA M 20 Industrial trauma with ruptured spleen and left renal contusion. Splenectomy.
IS F 19 Traumatic pancreatitis requiring distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy.
RF M 26 Meningococcal meningitis leading to meningococcal septicemia .
DB M 23 Head injury with multiple frontal lobe contusio 1000 ns. No surgery required.
DH M 53 Head injury with facial fractures. Fractured ribs. Right lung contusion.
HJ M 25 Intra-abdominal abscess.
MK M 39 Basal skull fracture. Pneumothorax. Fractures of left humerus and ribs. Bilateral fracture of clavicles.
DP M 32 Head injury. Right intracerebral haematoma.
GP M 53 Urolithiasis causing septic shock.
KS M 16 Trauma-frontal lobe haematoma. Fractures of left tibia, radius and ulna.
ST M 25 Multiple abscesses. Laparotomy required.

Body composition measurements

Tritium dilution. TBW was determined following the IV injection of a tracer dose of tritiated water (3.7 MBq) as described in detail elsewhere6. Blood samples were taken at 4, 5 and 6 hours after injection and tritium assayed in water extracted from the serum. TBW is assumed to be the tritiated water space as given by the mean of the 4-, 5- and 6-hour samples.

In vivo neutron activation analysis. The prompt gamma IVNAA technique as implemented in this Department for the measurement of critically-ill patients has been described in detail elsewhere7. The patient lies supine on a horizontal couch which is driven at a constant speed between two 238PuBe neutron sources, one above and one beneath the couch. Collimated beams of fast neutrons from the sources irradiate the patient. Gamma rays emitted during the irradiation are counted by four 5 x 6 cm sodium iodide scintillation counters mounted two on each side of the patient. Net counting rates due to ne 1000 utron capture gamma rays from nitrogen (10.8 Mev) are recorded. Total body protein (P) is calculated assuming nitrogen comprises 16% of the protein in the body.

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. DEXA can be used to partition body mass into three components: total body fat (F), bone mineral content (B), and fat-free soft tissue (L)1,8. DEXA measurements were performed using a commercial scanner (model DPX+, Lunar Radiation Corp, Madison, Wl, USA) and the manufacturer's whole-body software (version 3.6y).

Single frequency bio-electrical impedance analysis. A four-terminal impedance analyser was used to measure resistance and reactance following the manufacturer's instructions (Model BIA-101, RJL Systems, Detroit, Ml, USA). Gel electrodes were placed on the hand and foot of the dominant side and measurements were taken with arms and legs slightly spread. The measured values of resistance and reactance were entered into the computer program supplied by RJL Systems, along with the subject's weight, height, age, and sex, to provide estimates of TBW.

Multiple frequency bio-electrical impedance analysis. A Xitron-4000B impedance analyser (Xitron Technologies, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was used to measure resistance, reactance, impedance and phase angle at 48 frequencies between 5 and 500 kHz. A tetrapolar arrangement of gel electrodes was applied as for the single frequency measurement. The data collected by an online computer were fitted to modelling software provided by the manufacturers. The Cole-Cole electrical circuit model for muscle tissue is used to generate values for the resistivities of the extra- and intracellular fluid spaces and the volumes of these spaces are derived from equations developed by the manufacturers based on the volume theories of Hanai9.

Calculations and statistical analysis. TBW was calculated from the IVNAA and DEXA results by a difference method which assumes a six-compartment model for the body, ie:

TBW by difference = weight - P - B - F - G - NB, (1)

where the small non-bone minerals (NB) and glycogen (G) compartments are estimated from total protein and total minerals, respectively, based on the sizes of these compartments in reference man10. NB is calculated as 5.7% of total protein and G is estimated as 15% of total minerals (B+NB). Inclusion of these two components reduces the systematic error that would otherwise arise in extracting TBW by a difference approach.

Figure 1. Ten day losses in total body water for each of 12 patients measured by tritium dilution, a compartmental modelling approach (difference method), single frequency (SFBIA) and multifrequency (MFBIA) bioimpedance analysis.

Table 2. Body composition changes over 10 days in 12 intensive care patients.

1000

Components of body composition (kg).

Patient Weight Protein Fat Bone mineral
  Day 0 Day 10 Day 0 Day 10 Day 0 Day 10 Day 0 Day 10
SA 85.3 74.2 12.44 12.36 6.89 5.66 4.14 3.99
DB 63.2 58.2 8.42 8.04 10.06 9.16 2.75 2.70
DF 76.4 67.9 11.73 10.18 8.23 6.86 3.01 2.88
DH 90.3 76.8 13.40 10.30 10.47 10.45 4.01 3.86
HJ 75.7 58.4 9.07 7.73 11.55 9.99 2.93 2.75
MK 90.7 75.1 12.56 10.19 17.10 16.95 3.00 3.04
DP 74.9 64.7 10.08 8.77 8.94 8.64 2.95 2.81
GP 90.5 84.2 10.58 9.44 23.14 21.68 3.01 3.08
IS 57.8 51.1 7.43 6.65 13.83 14.56 2.65 2.41
KS 80.9 67.0 11.74 8.97 8.19 7.61 3.29 3.31
ST 95.3 87.7 12.76 12.66 13.79 14.39 3.53 3.81
CT 74.2 67.6 10.40 9.08 8.80 8.31 4.05 3.86
Differences                
Mean -10.2 -1.35 -0.56 -0.07
SEM 1.2 0.28 0.22 0.04
P <0.0001 0.0006 0.029 ns

t-test for 10 day difference; ns, not significant.

Tritium dilution was compared with the other methods of TBW estimation by using repeated measures analysis of variance and regression analyses as indicated. All statistical analyses were carried out using SAS (Statistical Analysis System)11. Limits of agreement (mean difference ± 2SD of the differences) between TBW by tritium dilution and the other methods were calculated using the method of Bland and Altman12. A significance level of 5% was used.

Protocol

Patients were transported to the body composition laboratory of the Department of Surgery as soon as they were haemodynamically stable. An electrically operated hoist incorporating a load cell for weighing the patient was used to transfer the patient to the scanning couches for body composition assessment. The measurements were repeated on each patient 10 days following the initial assessment. Supine height of each patient was used to determine scanning time for IVNAA. Standing height was measured following recovery.

Results

The changes in body weight and in body composition assessed by DEXA and IVNAA for the 12 patients over 10 days are shown in Table 2. A dramatic fall in body weight was observed (mean loss 10.2 kg, P<0.0001) and all patients lost protein (mean loss 1.4 kg, P<0.001). The individual 10 day changes in TBW as measured by four independent methods are presented in Figure 1. Table 3 shows the mean changes in TBW over the 10 days measured by tritium dilution compared with measurements using the bioimpedance and difference techniques. The 10 day losses were statistically significant for all four methods (paired t-tests, P<0.0001). Repeated measures ANOVA indicated no significant difference between tritium dilution and TBW measured by any of the other three methods for either day of measurement or for the 10 day changes. When measurements for both days are combined the correlations between tritium TBW and the other TBW methods were all highly significant (P<0.0001) (Table 4). The linear regressions of each of these three other methods on tritium TBW were not significantly different from the line of identity although the SEE for the difference method was approximately half those found for the bioimpedance methods. When the 10 day changes in TBW by tritium dilution were correlated with the changes measured by the difference, SFBIA and MFBIA techniques the respective correlation coefficients were 0.84 (P<0.001), 0.71 (P<0.01), and 0.45 (ns) (Table 5). For all the measurements taken the difference technique measures on average 1.09 ± 0.35 (SEM) kg more than tritium dilution with limits of agreement ranging between -4.5 and 2.4 kg (Table 1000 6). Although the bias is not significant for the SFBIA method (mean difference 0.93 ± 0.69 kg) the limits of agreement range between -7.7 and 5.8 kg. The MFBIA method underestimates the water space given by tritium dilution with similarly wide limits of agreement ranging from -4.4 to 9.2 kg.

Table 3. Total body water measurements (kg) in 12 patients over 10 days by four methods (mean ± SEM).

  Day 0 Day 10 10 day loss P value*
Tritium 51.3± 2.5 43.6± 2.3 7.7± 0.8 <0.0001
Difference 52.8± 2.5 44.4± 2.2 8.4± 0.9 <0.0001
SFBIA 53.3± 2.9 43.5± 2.4 9.7± 1.3 <0.0001
MFBIA 49.2± 2.6 41.0± 2.6 8.2± 0.8 <0.0001
ANOVAt ns ns ns  

*t-test for 10-day loss. tRepeated measures ANOVA comparing the four methods of measurements; ns, not significant.

Table 4. Correlations (r) between TBW measured by tritium dilution and three other methods for measurements on 12 patients on two occasions.

Method Slope* Intercept* SEE(kg) CV(%) r P
Difference 1.00 1.32 1.76 3.6 0.98 <0.0001
SFBIA 1.09 -3.13 3.37 7.0 0.95 <0.0001
MFBIA 1.02 -3.36 3.46 7.7 0.94 <0.0001

*Slope and intercept for the regression on TBW by tritium dilution

Table 5. Correlations (r) between 10 day changes in TBW measured by tritium dilution and three other methods for 12 patients.

Method Slope* Intercept* SEE(kg) r P
Difference 1.02 0.51 1.83 0.84 0.0006
SFBIA 1.21 0.42 3.29 0.71 0.009
MFBIA 0.49 -4.45 2.72 0.45 ns

*Slope and intercept for the regression on TBW by tritium dilution.

Table 6. Mean differences (± SEM) and limits of agreement for comparison of TBW measured by tritium dilution with three other methods for measurements on 12 patients on two occasions.

Method Mean difference (kg)* SEM (kg) Limits of agreement (kg)
Difference -1.09 0.35 -4.53 - 2.35
SFBIA -0 93 0.69 -7.68 - 5.84
MFBIA 2.40 0.69 -4.38 -9.18

*TBW by tritium dilution minus other method.

Discussion

Tracer dilution methods, using deuterated or tritiated water, are well established as a means of determining the size of the total body water compartment in human subjects. These methods necessitate, however, time-consuming analyses of blood samples and, in the case of tritium, a radiation dose to the subject. A rapid, safe, noninvasive and straightforward technique for measuring this, the largest compartment of the body, would prove to be of considerable benefit both to the clinician and to the body composition researcher. BIA is such a technique which has proved reliable for assessment of TBW in healthy subjects3-5. Its reliability in pathological conditions, however, is controversial13,14. In the present study we have compared TBW measurements from two BIA instruments and a compartmental modelling approach with tritium dilution as an established reference technique for body water estimation. We have demonstrated that in a group of patients undergoing large changes in hydration status BIA can reliably monitor these fluid changes. The residual variances about the regressions on TBW by dilution and the wide limits of agreement between the dilution and the BIA techniques suggest that the BIA methods are inappropriate at the present time for measuring changes in total water in the individual intensive care patient. The compartmental modelling approach agrees well with the results of tritium dilution and confirms, at least for the measurement of changes in TBW, the accuracy of the latter. For the measurement of absolute size of the water compartment both approaches are subject to small systematic errors which, in the case of tritium dilution, derive from the extent of exchange with non-aqueous hydrogenl5, and in the case of the difference approach, derive largely from fluctuations in the glycogen compartment.

Acknowledgments—This work was supported by the Health Research Council of New Zealand and Ross Laboratories, Columbus, OH. We would like to thank the staff of the Department of Critical Care Medicine in Auckland Hospital without whose support this study would not have been possible.

References

  1. Mazess RB, Barden HS, Bisek JP, Hanson J. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for total-body and regional bone-mineral and soft-tissue composition. Am J Clin Nutr 1990; 51: 1106- 12.
  2. Heymsfield SB, Smith R, Aulet M, Bensen B, Lichtman S, Wang J, Pierson RN. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: measurement by dual-photon absorptiometry. Am J Clin Nutr 1989; 52: 214-8.
  3. Van Loan MD, Mayclin PL. Use of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis for the estimation of extracellular fluid. Eur J Clin Nutr 1992; 46: 117-24.
  4. Segal KR, Burastero, Chun A, Coronel P, Pierson RN, Wang J. Estimation of extracellular and total body water by multiple-frequency bioelectrical-impedance measurement. Am J Clin Nutr 1991; 54: 26-9.
  5. Kushner RF, Schoeller DA. Estimation of total body water by bioelectrical impedance analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 1986; 44: 417-24.
  6. Streat SJ, Beddoe AH, Hill GL. Measurement a60 of total body water in intensive care patients with fluid overload. Metabolism 1985; 34: 688-94.
  7. Mitra S, Plank LD, Hill CL. Calibration of a prompt gamma in vivo neutron activation facility for direct measurement of total body protein in intensive care patients. Phys Med Biol 1993; 38: 1971-5.
  8. Heymsfield SB, Wang J, Heshka S, Kehayias JJ, Pierson RN. Dual-photon absorptiometry: comparison of bone mineral and soft tissue mass measurements in vivo with established methods. Am J Clin Nutr 1989; 49: 1283-89.
  9. Hanai T. Electrical properties of emulsions. In: Sherman P, ed. Emulsion Science, London: Academic Press, 1968: 354-477.
  10. ICRP. Report of the Task Group on Reference Man. International Commission on Radiologic Protection. Oxford, UK: Pergamon, 1975.
  11. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.03 Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1988.
  12. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-10.
  13. Zillikens MC, van den Berg JWO, Wilson JHP, Swart GR. Whole-body and segmental bioelectrical-impedance analysis in patients with cirrhosis of the liver: changes after treatment of ascites. Am J Clin Nutr 1992; 55: 621-5.
  14. Meguid MM, Lukaski HC, Tripp MD, Rosenberg JM, Parker FB. Rapid bedside method to assess changes in postoperative fluid status with bioelectrical impedance analysis. Surgery 1992; 112: 502-8.
  15. Streat SJ, Beddoe AH, Hill GL. Measurement of body fat and hydration of the fat-free body in health and disease. Metabolism 1985; 34: 509-518.


Copyright © 1995 [Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition]. All rights reserved.
Revised: January 19, 1999 .

to the top

0