The
Grains and Cereals Debate
Plant
foods such as fruits, vegetables, grains
and cereals are an important part of the
diet. They provide many essential vitamins,
minerals and phytochemicals (or phytonutrients)
to the body, which in turn protect against
various chronic diseases.
There seems no doubt that a higher consumption
of vegetables in particular, is associated
with less illness, especially cancer. However,
while fruit and vegetables have traditionally
been available to humans throughout evolution,
grain foods in any quantity, have only been
around since the agricultural revolution
- about 10,000 years.
Recent data suggests that we may be eating
too many cereals, especially refined cereals
(where the bran and wheatgerm has been removed
e.g. white flour). Refined cereals are not
as nutritionally desirable because they
have significantly lower concentrations
of vitamins, minerals, phytochemicals and
a higher glycaemic index (GI). Sometimes
refined cereals are fortified with vitamins
and minerals, but it would be difficult
to add back the cocktail of phytochemicals
lost during refinement.
What's
good about WHOLE grains?
An
increased intake of wholegrain cereals has
been found to be negatively associated with
heart attacks and other heart problems in
75,000 nurses over 6 years (Liu et al.,
1999). An increased intake of cereal fibre
has also been reported to lower the risk
of coronary heart disease (JAMA 1996; 27
Supp: 447) and the inclusion of 3g per day
of soluble fibre from oats results in an
approximate 2% lowering of blood cholesterol
levels.
There has been much media attention to the
antioxidant phytochemicals in fruits and
vegetables, but more recently, unrefined
(wholegrain) cereals have been found to
contain a whole host of phytochemicals such
as tocotrienols, lignans, sterols, oryzanol,
phytic acid, tannins, saponins and phenolics.
These compounds found in whole grains are
now thought to play a role in protecting
against heart disease and cancer.
Lignans found in wholegrain cereals are
converted to mammalian lignans when consumed
by humans. These have a similar structure
to the human hormone oestrogen and may have
anti-oestrogenic effects. Higher serum lignan
levels have been associated with a lower
incidence of coronary events (Lancet 1999;
354 (9196): 2112). Studies by Professor
Lilian Thompson at The University of Toronto,
show that feeding lignans to animals which
already had cancerous tumours, results in
the regression of cancer and also slows
cancer growth. Phytic acid has been shown
to lower the glycemic index of foods, which
benefits diabetics, and has also been shown
to reduce the ability of iron to contribute
to the development of cancerous cells in
the colon. It may also have protective actions
through binding iron and preventing its
action as an oxidant. In relation to concerns
about the action of phytic acid on mineral
binding, this is not a problem with fibre
intakes between 25-30g per day. Saponins,
phytosterols, squalene, oryzanol and tocotrienols
have been shown to have hypocholesterolaemic
effects. The phenolic compounds caffeic,
gallic, ellagic and coumaric acids may also
have antioxidant effects.
Could
we be getting too much grain food?
New
research has emerged however, indicating
that eating too much grain can have detrimental
effects on health. The Seven Countries Study
has followed the eating patterns of over
12,000 men for almost 30 years. This study
has shown a decreased risk of stomach cancer
and is associated with a high fruit and
vegetable intake. Re-analysis of this data
has shown that the risk of stomach cancer
increases with high intakes of grain foods.
Risk has shown to be reduced where whole
grains are consumed, but higher with high
intakes of refined grains and breads. The
risk remains even when the effects of cigarette
smoking are taken into account. The increased
risk is not only associated with high grain
intakes, but other characteristics of the
diet as well. High grain intakes are associated
with low intakes of fruit and vegetables,
so people with a high intake of grains may
have other dietary characteristics, which
increase their risk. In the Male Health
Professional Study and the Nurses Health
Study, total carbohydrate intake has not
been related to a reduction
in the risk of diabetes whereas a higher
cereal fibre intake was related to a lower
risk. In contrast, a higher intake of high
glycaemic index foods has been associated
with an increased risk of developing diabetes
(Diabetes Care 1997; 20 (4): 545; JAMA 1997;
277 (6): 472).
Food
Guides and Cereal Intake.
Most
Healthy Eating Food Pyramids around the
world (e.g. American, 12345+ Food Pyramid)
recommend 5 to 6 tiers of intake of the
various food groups; breads and cereals
are usually placed in the bottom tier of
the pyramid (i.e. eat most), followed by
fruits and vegetables, then dairy, then
meat and finally the eat least category
includes fats and sugars.
The
Mediterranean and Asian Diet Pyramids place
fats lower down in the pyramid. The Australian
Guide to Healthy Eating, which is in the
shape of a plate, recommends a larger segment
of cereal foods (up to about 7 serves of
cereal/day which is equivalent to 14 slices
of bread), followed by vegetables/legumes
and then fruit. Even though all these guides
recommend a preference for wholegrain cereals,
the recommended number of serves may be
achieved with refined cereal products by
some consumers.
Interestingly, the Australian Nutrition
Foundation's (now known as Nutrition Australia)
Healthy Eating Pyramid, first developed
in the 1980s, has always had only 3 tiers.
The 'Eat Most' tier includes Vegetables,
Fruits, Legumes and Cereals, followed by
the 'Eat Moderately' tier of animal foods
and at the top or 'Eat Least' are the fats
and sugars. In other words, a variety of
plant foods are recommended in large quantities
as opposed to recommending a preference
for cereals over other plant foods. This
may still be the soundest nutritional advice
with respect to cereals.
Read
about the article on nutritional profile
and health benefits of cereals
References
Could
we be getting too much grain food? Choice
Health Reader, November, 1999
- Cordain
L. Cereal grains: Humanity's double-edged
sword. In Simopoulos AP (Ed). Evolutionary
aspects of Health and Diet, Exercise,
Genetics and Chronic Disease. World Review
of Nutrition and Dietetics, Basel, Karger,
1999;84:19-73.
- Liu
S et al. Whole-grain consumption and risk
of coronary heart disease: results from
the Nurses' Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr,
1999;70(3):412-419.
- Margje
CJF and others. Consumption of plant foods
and stomach cancer mortality in the seven
countries study. Is grain consumption
a risk factor? Nutrition and Cancer, 1999;
34(1):49-55.
- Natoli
S. Conference report - Cereals as functional
foods. Dieticians Association of Australia
Newsletter, March, 2000.
- To
read about the scientific evidence relating
cereals to disease see:
http://www.curtin.edu.au/curtin/dept/health/dgoa/cereals.htm
Last
Updated: September 2005
|