HEC PRESS Publisher of the
Healthy Eating Club website &
A
sia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition

 


Volume 16 (2007)
1 Issue 1
1 Issue 2
1 Issue 3
1 Issue 4
1 Supplement 1
1 Supplement 2
Volume 15 (2006)
Issue 1
Issue 2
Issue 3
Issue 4
Supplement
Nutrition Society of Australia
Volume 14 (2005)
Issue 1
Supplement on CD
IUNS/APCNS proceedings
Issue 2
Issue 3
Issue 4
Supplement
Nutrition Society of Australia
CURRENT YEAR ISSUES
LOGIN to FULL PAPERS
subscribers only
PAST ISSUES
View full papers (free)
CD-Rom AU$190 vol1-13
NUTRITION SOCIETY OF AUSTRALIA 1976-
View Abstracts
Search our site
 
Asia Pacific J Clin Nutr (1994) 3, 141-143 141

Asia Pacific J Clin Nutr (1994) 3, 141-143

Body composition of Chinese compared with data from North America

Zhu-ming Jiang MD, Nai-fa Yang, Marc R. Scheltinga MD and Douglas W. Wilmore MD

Departments of Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China; and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

A multiple tracer dilution method measuring total body water (TBW) and extra cellular water (ECW) was used to study body composition. Healthy Chinese were compared to a group of healthy Americans evaluated by similar dilutional methods. Compared to the American subjects, Chinese subjects were less heavy (body weight was 62.1 ± 2.0 kg vs 72.5± 4. 1, P<0.05), leaner (body fat was 19.6 ± 1.8% of body weight vs 25.8 ± 1.9, P<0.005), wetter (total body water was 58.9 ± 1.3% vs 54.3 ± 1.4, P<0.005) and had a greater percentage of body cell mass (50.9 ± 1.7% vs 44.2 ± 1.4, P<0.001). The multidilution method using deuterium oxide and sodium bromide to assess body composition is accurate but expensive and laborious. Therefore, equally precise but more economical bedside methods are needed for routine compositional analysis.

Introduction

Body compositional data obtained from healthy North American subjects studied with various techniques are widely available. The effect of disease on intercompartmental relationships has been studied in main western societies1-3. Less is known about body composition of Asian populations such as the Chinese or Japanese. The genome of Oriental people is derived from a different 'genetic pool', and Asian people have different dietary customs compared to North Americans. The principal energy source in China is rice or wheat which contains much less fat calories than the usual American diet4. Since food intake influences body composition, long-term differences in dietary intake may be reflected in differences in body composition. Although it is acknowledged that Chinese people have a lower mean body weight and less fat compared to North American Caucasians, it is not known whether all body compartments are proportionally decreased. A group of Chinese subjects in Taiwan studied using densitometric and anthropometric methods showed lower fat percentages compared to Americans.

In the present study, body composition data were obtained from a group of healthy male and female individuals and from surgical patients in the Beijing area of China. These data were then compared to compositional data previously obtained in a North American population1.

Subjects and methods

Subjects

The healthy Chinese group consisted of 22 subjects; physical examinations and routine laboratory tests showed no abnormalities.

The protocol was approved by the Academic Committee of the Peking Union Medical C 1000 ollege Hospital serving as the Institutional Review Board for the hospital. Consent to participate in the study was obtained from all subjects. The American data (n = 10) had been reported in a publication from authors at the Harvard Medical School1.

Methods

If a known amount of a substance ('tracer') is injected into the body and allowed to equilibrate within the compartment in which the tracer is known to distribute exclusively, the volume of this compartment can be calculated from a venous blood sample. Multiple tracers were simultaneously injected and allowed to equilibrate in various body fluid compartments. The concentrations of these tracers were then determined and the volume of the various compartments calculated1-14.

Tracers. 1. Pyrogen-free deuterium oxide (D2O, 99.6% purity, 40-50 ml, autoclave sterilized solution, Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) was used for measurement of total body water. 2. Pyrogen-free sodium bromide (4% NaBr, 20ml, autoclave sterilized solution, GR grade E. Merck, Germany) was used for extracellular water (ECW) measurement.

Sampling procedure. Deutrium oxide and sodium bromide were simultaneously injected intravenously within a 15-minute time period using a syringe pump. The volume of the tracers injected was determined by subtracting the weight of the empty syringes from the original weight of the syringes containing the tracers (Mettler Balance, Model AE 163, Basle, Switzerland).

For TBW venous blood samples (2 ml) were taken at two and three hours after injection of the D2O. The serum samples underwent double vacuum distillation at -70 °C to obtain the pure water fraction. The content of D2O in this sample was determined using the 'falling drop technique' as described by Schloerb5. A 125-litre thermal static water bath was used while the temperature variation was kept within ± 0.0005 °C . The accuracy of the 'falling drop method' is ± 0.5%. The error of repeated determination of TBW is 2.2%6.

For ECW blood samples (4 ml) were taken at two and three hours after injection of NaBr. Serum was heated in a nickel cruicible at 600 °C for a half hour to remove the organic matter which could interfere with the bromide determination as described by Hunter7,8. The method is based on the conversion of bromide into tetrabromorosaniline, which is measured calorimetrically. The accuracy is ± 1%; the total error of repeated determination is ± 2.3%2.

Abbreviations. BW = Body weight; TBW = Total body water; ECW = Extracellular water; ICW = Intracellular water; TBF = Total body fat; LBM = Lean body Mass; V = Volume (tracer); V' = Volume (measured compartment); C= Concentration; C' = Concentration in blood.

Data analysis. Personal computers (Macintosh) using standard statistical software (StatView) were used to analyse data. Student t-tests were applied to evaluate differences between groups. Significance was accepted at the P<0.05 level. The results were expressed as means ± sem.

Results

When body composition in the healthy Chinese males and females were examined, most of the compartments were larger in males than in females (Table 1). In contracts, when the percent of body fat was calculated, the males were lower compared to the females (TBF %BW = 19.6± 1.8 vs 25.5± 1.4, P<0.05). Also, the relative ECW was significantly lower in males than in females (23.3± 0.5% vs 25.6± 0.7, P<0.05). The relative plasma volume was not statistically different between groups.

Table 1. Comparison of healthy Chinese males and females.

Male Chinese (n= 15)

Female Chinese (n=7)

P

Age (yr)

36± 3

26± 5

= 0.05

Height (cm)

170± 1

155± 1

< 0.001

Body weight (kg)

62.1± 2.0

46.4± 1.8

< 0.001

TBW (I)

36.4± 1.0

25.4± 1.3

< 0.001

TBW (% BW)

58.9± 1.3

54.6± 1.1

< 0.05

ECW (I)

14.4± 0.5

11.8± 0.4

< 0.005

ECW (% BW)

23.3± 0.5

25.6± 0.7

<0.02

ECW (% TBW)

39.7± 0.9

47.1 ± 1.8

< 0.001

ICW (I)

22.0± 0.8

13.5± 1.1

< 0.001

ICW (% BW)

35.6± 1.2

29.0± 1.4

< 0.005

ICW (% TBW)

60.3± 0.9

52.9± 1.8

< 0.001

BCM (kg)

31.4± 1.1

19.3± 1.5

< 0.001

BCM (% BW)

50.9± 1.7

41.4± 2.0

& 1000 lt;0.01

LBM (kg)

49.7± 1.4

34.6± 1.8

< 0.001

LBM (%BW)

80.4± 1.8

74.5± 1.4

< 0.05

Table 2 shows data of healthy Chinese males, as well as data on American males published by Moore1. The groups were similar with respect to age (35.7 yrs vs 36.8). Chinese males were lighter (BW was 62.1± 2.0kg vs 72.5± 4.1, P<0.05), wetter (TBW was 58.9± 1.3% vs 54.3± 1.4, P<0.05) and leaner (TBF was 19.6± 1.8% vs 25.8± 1.9, P<0.05). Since ECW was not different between the two groups, the difference in TBW was due to an expansion of the ICW (35.6± I .2% vs 30.9± 3.0, P<0.01).

Table 2. Differences between healthy Chinese and American males.

Chinese (n= l5)

American (n= 10)

P

Age (yr)

36± 3

37± 4

= 0.9

Body weight (kg)

62.1 ± 2.0

72.5± 4.1

< 0.02

TBW (I)

36.4± 1.0

39.0± 1.8

= 0.2

TBW (% BW)

58.9± 1.3

54.3± 1.4

< 0.05

ECW (I)

14.4± 0.5

16.8± 0.8

< 0.02

ECW (% BW)

23.3± 0.5

23.4± 0.7

= 0.9

ECW (% TBW)

39.7± 0.9

43.1 ± 0.7

< 0.02

ICW (I)

22.0± 0.8

22.2± 1.1

= 0.8

ICW (% BW)

35.6± 1.2

30.9± 3.0

<0.01

ICW (% TBW)

60.3± 0.9

56.9± 0.7

< 0.02

BCM (kg)

31.4± 1.1

31.8± 1.6

= 0.8

BCM (% BW)

50.9± 1.7

44.2± 1.4

< 0.01

LBM (kg)

49.7± 1.4

53.3± 2.5

= 0.2

LBM (%BW)

80.4± 1.8

74.2± 1.9

< 0.05

Similar results were found with Chinese and American females (Table 3). Chinese females were lighter (BW was 46.4± 1 .8kg vs 59.3± 3. 1, P< 0.01 ) and wetter (54.6± 1 .1% vs 48.6± 1.5, P<0.01) than their American peers. Unlike the males, the difference in TBW was composed of both ICW and ECW. Healthy Chinese females had less fat (25.5± 1.4% vs 33.6± 2.0, P<0.01 ).

Table 3. Comparison between healthy Chinese and American females.

ICW (I)

Chinese (n=7)

American (n=10)

P

Age (yr)

26± 0.5

34± 3

= 0.2

Body weight (kg)

46.4± 1.8

59.3± 3.1

< 0.01

TBW (I)

25.4± 1.3

28.5± 0.9

= 0.06

TBW (% BW)

54.6± 1.1

48.6± 1.5

<0.01

ECW (I)

11.8± 0.4

13.4± 0.5

<0.05

ECW (% BW)

25.6± 0.7

22.7± 0.6

< 0.01

ECW (% TBW)

47.1± 1.8

46.9± 0.5

=0.9

13.5± 1.1

15.1± 0.5

=0.2

ICW (% BW)

29.0± 1.4

25.9± 1.0

= 0.01

ICW (% TBW)

52.9± 1.8

53.1± 0.5

=0.9

BCM (kg)

19.3± 1.5

21.6± 0.7

=0.2

BCM (% BW)

41.4± 2.0

37.0± 1.4

= 0.1

LBM (kg)

34.6± 1.8

38.9± 1.3

= 0.06

LBM (%BW)

74.5± 1.4

66.4± 2.0

< 0.01

Discussion

In this study, various fluid compartments were measured using a multitracer dilution method. Results were used to calculate relatively 'solid' compartments such as fat. However, the standard for determining absolute composition is the use of direct analytical techniques following cadaver desiccation. All other methods use various assumptions and therefore introduce potential errors which may eventually generate inaccurate compositional data. Equations derived from animal studies or healthy populations1 should be ideal in predicting body composition in corresponding populations. However, these equations may not be applicable in other (patient) populations. Deuterium oxide is a naturally occurring isotope of waterl4 and is considered an accurate dilution indicator for the measurement of TBW. After intravenous or oral administration, D2O equilibrates with all body water after two hours15. Although the 'falling drop' method to measure D2O is accurate, it is time consuming and therefore not the ideal method. Recently nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) has proven to be an accurate and rapid method of measurement of D2O concentrations in body fluids16. Sodium bromide is also a nonradioactive substance and used as a dilutional indicator to measure the extracellular phase of body waterl7. The multitracer dilution method used in this study is accurate but time consuming and laborious. More inexpensive and precise methods are needed so that compositional analysis can be applied as a clinical tool.

References

1. Moore FD, Olesen KH, McMurrey JD, Parker HV, Ball ML, Boyden CM. The body cell mass and its supporting environment: body composition in health and disease. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co, 1963.

2. Forbes GB. Human body composition. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987.

3. Shizgal HM. Body composition In: Fischer JE, Surgical Nutrition. Little and Brown, New York: j 1983, P.3-17.

4. Winston M, Eshelman RH. In: McKay D, American Heart Assoc 985 iation Cookbook, third edition, 1979.

5. Schloerb PR, Friis-Hansen BJ, Edelman, IS, Sheldon DB, Moore FD. The measurement of deuterium oxide in body fluids by the falling drop method J Lab Clin Med 10951; 37-653.

6. Tseng HC, Jiang AM, Fei LM. Total body water measured by heavy water dilution. Chinese Med J 1965; 34: 612. ( in Chinese).

7. Hunter G. Bromide determination in body fluids. Biochem J 1953; 54:42.

8. Hunter G. Micro-determination of bromide in body fluids. Biochem J 1955; 60:-261.

9. Chen MC, Jiang ZM. The measurement of body fluids. In: The clinical water and electrolytes balance. Beijing: People's Health Publishing, 1980:584 594 ( in Chinese).

10. Sterling K, Gray SJ. Determination of the circulating red cell mass (volume) in man by radioactive chromium. J Clin Invest 1950, 29: 1614.

11. Fei LM, Jiang ZM, Tseng HS. Using 51Cr tagged red blood cells to determine blood in Chinese. Chin Surg J 1966; 15: 313.

12. Chen KP, Damon A, Elliot O. Body form, composition and some physiological functions of Chinese in Taiwan. Ann New York Acad Sci 1963; 110: 760.

13. Wesdorp RIC. Role of abnormal metabolism in the aetiology of cancer cachexia. Clinics in Oncology 1986; 5: 307.

14. Havesy G, Hofer E: Die Verweilzeit des Wassers in Menschlichen Korper, Untersucht mit Hilfe von Schweren Wasser als Indicator. Klin Wochenschr 1934 13: 1524.

15. Schloerb PR, Friis-Hansen BJ, Edelman LS, Solomon AK, Moore FD. The measurement of total body water in the human subject by deuterium oxide dilution. J Clin Invest 1950; 29: 1296.

16. Abu Khaled M, Lakaski HC, Watkins CL. Determination of total body water by deuterium NMR. Am J Clin Nutr 1987; 45: 1.

17. Weir E. Determination of the total body chloride content of animals following administration of sodium bromide. Am J Phys 1939; 127:338.

Copyright © 1994 [Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition]. All rights reserved.
Please note: this article has been scanned and reformatted.
Please contact lshirven@ozemail.com.au if any errors are suspected.
Revised: March 30, 2000. 

 

0